Research Paper
Year: 2023 | Month: August | Volume: 10 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 324-332
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230840
The Influence of Student Innovation Management Subject and Students’ Creativity in Increasing the Quality of Learning
Susi Damayanti1, Sri Aliami2
1,2Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Nusantara PGRI University Kediri, Indonesia
Corresponding Author: Susi Damayanti
ABSTRACT
In learning activities, it is very necessary to have optimal synergy, especially from lecturers and students, as well as a study of the subjects taught in class either through theoretical studies which are then carried out in practice to find out whether the theory can really be proven in the real world through the practice of creating a product. or new services from the results of students' creative thinking and work guided by lecturers in innovation management courses. The purpose of the research conducted this time was to determine the influence between innovation management courses and student creativity, especially in improving the quality of student learning. The method used to obtain data in research is to use quantitative methods using comparative analysis to find out how big the comparison is in the quality of learning. This research was conducted on 104 students majoring in management. The results obtained by researchers include: 1) From the results obtained, it can be seen that the innovation management course has an effect on improving the quality of learning; 2) Furthermore, from the results that have been analysed, it can be seen that the level of student creativity has an effect on improving the quality of learning; and 3) The quality of learning that occurs in class can be seen from the learning outcomes of class 2F students, namely from the average midterm exam score of 79 and the average final semester exam score of 87, class 2G, namely from the average midterm exam score of 76 and the average semester final exam score is 85, and class 2H is from the average midterm exam score of 81 and the average semester final exam score is 85; 4) The comparative test results for class 2F are 0.000 <0.05, indicating a significant difference between the midterm exam scores and the final exam scores, class 2G, namely 0.000 <0.05, indicating a significant difference between the midterm exam scores. Semester with the end of semester exam scores, and class 2H, which is equal to 0.000 <0.05, indicating a significant difference between the midterm exam scores and the final semester exam scores.
Keywords: Innovation Management, Student Creativity, Learning Quality
[PDF Full Text]